Blog

Realness in CBT therapy is just as important as structured techniques, as authentic engagement between client and therapist shapes lasting mental health outcomes. Walking into therapy can feel intimidating. Many clients show up with rehearsed thoughts, careful words, and a watchful eye on how they are being perceived. Therapists, in turn, are trained to remain calm, composed, and professional, often masking their own human reactions to maintain a sense of safety. Underneath this careful performance, however, the most powerful force in therapy quietly waits: realness.

Realness is the ability to be authentic and emotionally present, both as a client and as a therapist (Rogers, 1961). For clients, it means expressing what they truly feel, even when it is uncomfortable, confusing, or messy. For therapists, it means acknowledging imperfections, moments of uncertainty, and the occasional misstep, and then using those moments to strengthen the therapeutic relationship (Elliott, Bohart, Watson, & Greenberg, 2011). Research consistently shows that authentic interactions like these lead to stronger therapeutic alliances and better outcomes for clients (Kolden, Wang, Austin, Chang, & Klein, 2011).

Client Realness and Emotional Expression

Clients often arrive at therapy already experts at managing themselves to appear “okay.” Emotions may have been minimized, thoughts overanalyzed, and behaviors carefully monitored to avoid judgment. CBT therapy and cognitive behavioural interventions provide practical strategies for handling anxiety, depression, and stress (Beck, 2011). They help clients identify unhelpful thought patterns and develop coping skills. But if these strategies are applied without authentic engagement, they risk becoming a performance rather than a path to deep change (Greenberg & Watson, 2005). Realness allows clients to bring not only their thoughts but also their full emotional experience into the room.

Therapist Authenticity and Imperfection

Therapists often feel the pressure to remain perfect. There is an unspoken expectation that they should manage every emotional reaction, provide answers, and never falter. Yet research in psychotherapy shows that when therapists embrace their human side, admit when something didn’t work, or repair a relational misattunement, outcomes improve (Safran & Muran, 2000). These moments of authenticity teach clients that imperfection is normal and safe, and they model self-compassion, resilience, and relational repair (Neff, 2003).

Rupture and Repair: Learning Through Imperfection

Ruptures in therapy are normal and even necessary. A rupture is any moment where misunderstanding, tension, or discomfort occurs in the relationship. When these moments are recognized and repaired authentically — for example, by acknowledging a miscommunication or clarifying a misunderstanding — the therapeutic alliance is often strengthened, resulting in improved client outcomes (Safran & Muran, 2000). Experiencing a therapist who can openly navigate these moments provides clients with a relational template for how relationships can survive mistakes and how emotional honesty can coexist with safety.

Client Realness Enhances CBT

Client realness also impacts the effectiveness of structured interventions like CBT therapy. When clients speak honestly about emotions that might contradict their rational thoughts, therapists can help integrate those emotions with cognitive strategies, leading to more profound change (Beck, 2011). Emotional honesty enhances engagement, strengthens the therapeutic alliance, and contributes to symptom reduction (Watson & Greenberg, 2010). Conversely, if a client feels pressured to maintain a polished or acceptable self, therapy may only scratch the surface, leaving core issues unaddressed.

Online Therapy and Realness

Online therapy presents a unique context for realness. Some worry that therapy delivered through a screen might lack depth. However, studies show that online CBT therapy and other interventions can be as effective as in-person sessions when therapists cultivate authentic connections (Andersson, Carlbring, Titov, & Lindefors, 2014; Carlbring, Andersson, Cuijpers, Riper, & Hedman-Lagerlöf, 2018). Interestingly, the online setting can encourage clients to be even more real. Being in a familiar environment often makes it easier to express emotions honestly, reducing performance pressure and fostering genuine engagement.

Mental Health Benefits of Realness

The benefits of realness in therapy extend beyond symptom reduction. Clients who experience authentic connection report improved emotional regulation (Gross, 2015), reduced shame and self-criticism (Neff, 2003), and greater resilience. Observing a therapist navigate imperfections and repair ruptures offers a model for real-life relationships, teaching skills in communication, problem-solving, and emotional honesty (Safran & Muran, 2000). Over time, these experiences contribute to deeper self-understanding, stronger coping skills, and lasting psychological change.

Therapy as a Collaborative Process

Therapy is a co-created relationship. Neither client nor therapist bears sole responsibility for success. Instead, both contribute to the process: clients bring their experience, courage, and willingness to engage, while therapists provide guidance, containment, and support. Collaborative approaches, particularly in cognitive behavioural and online therapy, emphasize shared responsibility and active participation, which research shows leads to better outcomes (Beck, 2011; Kolden et al., 2011). Realness ensures that this collaboration is grounded in genuine human connection rather than performance or perfection.

Integrating Realness with CBT

Realness also has profound effects on mental health outcomes. Experiencing authenticity in therapy can decrease anxiety, depression, and chronic stress by allowing clients to process emotions rather than suppress them. Emotional processing strengthens neural pathways that support self-regulation and resilience (Gross, 2015). When clients see therapists handling imperfections with honesty and repair, they internalize models of healthy self-reflection and emotional regulation, which extend beyond therapy into daily life.

In CBT therapy, cognitive restructuring and behavior modification are essential, but without the emotional and relational component of realness, change can be superficial. Integrating authentic emotional expression with structured cognitive techniques allows clients to experience their feelings fully while learning practical strategies to manage distressing thoughts and behaviors. This combination has been linked to more enduring symptom reduction and improved well-being (Watson & Greenberg, 2010).

Conclusion

Therapy thrives in authenticity. Healing emerges when both client and therapist allow themselves to be human, embrace vulnerability, and engage honestly with emotions. CBT therapy and cognitive behavioural strategies are powerful tools, but their impact grows when combined with realness, both in-person and online therapy. Moments of imperfection, emotional honesty, and relational repair do not weaken therapy — they are the medium through which meaningful, lasting change occurs. Realness transforms therapy from a structured technique into a living, relational experience, creating the conditions for deep and enduring mental health growth.

References

Andersson, G., Carlbring, P., Titov, N., & Lindefors, N. (2014). Internet interventions for adults with anxiety and mood disorders: A narrative umbrella review of recent meta-analyses. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 43(3), 207–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/16506073.2014.915521

Beck, J. S. (2011). Cognitive behavior therapy: Basics and beyond (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.

Carlbring, P., Andersson, G., Cuijpers, P., Riper, H., & Hedman-Lagerlöf, E. (2018). Internet-based vs. face-to-face cognitive behavior therapy for psychiatric and somatic disorders: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 47(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/16506073.2017.1401115

Elliott, R., Bohart, A. C., Watson, J. C., & Greenberg, L. S. (2011). Empathy. Psychotherapy, 48(1), 43–49. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022187

Greenberg, L. S., & Watson, J. C. (2005). Emotion-focused therapy for depression. American Psychological Association.

Gross, J. J. (2015). Emotion regulation: Current status and future prospects. Psychological Inquiry, 26(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2014.940781

Kolden, G. G., Wang, C. C., Austin, S. B., Chang, Y., & Klein, M. H. (2011). Congruence/genuineness, therapist effects, and the alliance. Psychotherapy Research, 21(6), 670–679. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2011.607322

Neff, K. D. (2003). Self-compassion: An alternative conceptualization of a healthy attitude toward oneself. Self and Identity, 2(2), 85–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298860309032

Rogers, C. R. (1961). On becoming a person: A therapist’s view of psychotherapy. Houghton Mifflin.

Safran, J. D., & Muran, J. C. (2000). Negotiating the therapeutic alliance: A relational treatment guide. Guilford Press.

Watson, J. C., & Greenberg, L. S. (2010). Emotion-focused therapy for depression. In M. J. Lambert (Ed.), Bergin and Garfield’s handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (6th ed., pp. 555–594). Wiley.